Buying a new SUV? Crash ratings may make you think again
by Tom Krisher, The Associated Press
Several popular models fared poorly in Insurance Institute of Highway Safety evaluations
DETROIT—Only two of 13 small SUVs performed well in front-end crash tests done by an insurance industry group, with several popular models faring poorly in the evaluations.
Subaru’s 2014 Forester was the only vehicle to get the top “good” rating in the results.
The 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport was rated as “acceptable.”
But fast-selling models such as the Ford Escape, Jeep Wrangler and Canadian-made Honda CR-V received only “marginal” or “poor” ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Small and mid-size SUVs, which get decent gas mileage and have the cargo and passenger space of larger SUVs, are among the fastest-growing segments of the U.S. auto market.
Sales grew 50 per cent from 2005 to last year, when U.S. consumers bought more than 2.5 million of them, according to Ward’s AutoInfoBank.
The IIHS ratings are influential because many auto shoppers find them while researching vehicles on the Internet.
The group says its crash tests and ratings are designed to get automakers to improve crashworthiness of their vehicles.
The ratings are for the institute’s “small overlap” crash test that covers only 25 per cent of a vehicle’s front end.
The test was added to the IIHS evaluations last year, with the institute aiming to push automakers into bolstering the crash resistance of their vehicles.
The group’s tests are more stringent than the U.S. government’s full-width front crash test.
The institute says that in many vehicles, a crash affecting one-quarter of the front end misses the main structures designed to absorb the impact of a crash.
Yet such crashes account for nearly a quarter of the collisions that cause serious or fatal injuries to people in the front seats, IIHS said.
The new Ford Escape, the top-selling small SUV so far this year, got a “poor” overall rating, while Honda’s CR-V, the number-two seller, got a “marginal” rating.
Toyota’s RAV-4, another big seller made in Canada, hasn’t done the testing yet because Toyota asked for a delay to improve the vehicle’s structure, the IIHS said.
Other SUVs getting “poor” ratings were the Jeep Patriot, Buick Encore, Kia Sportage and Hyundai Tuscson, the institute said.
The BMW X1, Nissan Rogue, Mazda CX-5, Volkswagen Tiguan and Jeep Wrangler two-door all got “marginal” ratings.
Ford said in a statement that the Escape is safe because it is equipped with advanced safety features and a structure designed to manage the impact of a crash.
But the company said it takes new developments in crash performance seriously.
“This is the first time IIHS has conducted this type of test on small SUVs. We are reviewing its findings in the context of our current design evaluations,” Ford said.
A Honda spokesman was checking with the company’s crash experts before commenting.
The Forester and Outlander Sport each received the IIHS’ coveted “Top Safety Pick Plus” award because they performed well in multiple tests including the small offset crash.
Many of the other SUVs, including the Escape and CR-V, won “Top Safety Pick” designations, but didn’t get the “plus” due to their performance in the small offset tests.
Only 20 vehicles have received the IIHS “Top Safety Pick Plus” award.
All SUVs tested, except the Forester, were 2012 or 2013 models.
The institute said tests of 2012 models were valid because no significant design changes were made between model years.
IIHS is a non-profit research group funded by auto insurance companies.
It develops crash tests to cut deaths, injuries and property damage from car and truck crashes.
Print this page