ALBANY, N.Y.—New York’s top court handed a victory to opponents of hydraulic fracturing by affirming the right of municipalities in the state to ban the practice within their borders.
The state Court of Appeals upheld a midlevel appeals court ruling from last year that said the state oil and gas law doesn’t trump the authority of local governments to control land use through zoning.
The fracking cases from two central New York towns have been closely watched by drillers hoping to tap into the state’s piece of the Marcellus Shale formation and by environmentalists who fear water and air pollution.
Both sides are still waiting to see whether a statewide moratorium on fracking in effect since July 2008 will be lifted.
The court in a 5-2 decision stressed that it did not consider the merits of fracking, only the authority of municipalities to regulate land use.
The court said the towns of Dryden and Middlefield both acted properly.
“The towns both studied the issue and acted within their home rule powers in determining that gas drilling would permanently alter and adversely affect the deliberately-cultivated, small-town character of their communities,” according to the majority ruling by Judge Victoria Graffeo.
Fracking frees natural gas from deep rock deposits by injecting wells with chemical-laden water at high pressure.
It has helped boost oil and gas production in the United States to the highest level in more than a quarter-century but has mobilized environmentalists alarmed at its rise.
Drilling opponents say more than 170 towns have passed bans or moratoriums.
Another 40 towns have passed resolutions supporting gas development.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has said he won’t decide whether to lift the state’s 6-year-old moratorium on fracking for gas until a health impact review launched in 2012 is completed.
There’s no timetable for the review.
The group New Yorkers Against Fracking renewed its call on Cuomo to enact a permanent statewide ban in light of the high court decision, saying “water and air contamination don’t stop at local boundaries.”
The Dryden, N.Y., ban was challenged by a trustee for Norse Energy Corp. ASA, a Norway-based company that went bankrupt after amassing thousands of leases on New York land it was never able to develop.
The Middlefield, N.Y., ban was challenged by Cooperstown Holstein Corp., a dairy farm that had leased land for drilling.
Karen Moreau of the state Petroleum Council said the ruling threatens the rights of landowners who want to lease their property for development and reduces the chances of long-term investment in the region, given the turnover in local boards.
“There are real losses here, and it’s a real tragedy for thousands of impoverished farmers and rural people,” she said.
In his dissent, Judge Eugene Pigott Jr. argued that the local ordinances, which touch on areas like storage and productions materials, are so broadly written they create “a blanket ban” on the industry.
“The zoning ordinances of Dryden and Middlefield do more than just regulate land use, they regulate oil, gas and solution mining industries under the zoning,” he wrote.
A number of communities in the U.S. and Canada have enacted fracking bans.
This is not the first time a state’s top court has considered the role of local regulations.
In December, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down significant portions of a state law that limited the power of local governments to determine where the natural gas drilling industry can operate.
Seven municipalities sued, arguing that the zoning restrictions ran counter to objectives of protecting the environment, health and safety of people who live there.