Hyundai, Kia pay US$100M to end probe of overstated mileage
Korean sister companies will forfeit greenhouse gas credits worth more than US$200 million, according to U.S. EPA
WASHINGTON—Korean automakers Hyundai Motor Co. and Kia Motors Corp. will pay the United States government a US$100-million civil penalty to end a two-year investigation into overstated gas mileage figures on window stickers on 1.2 million vehicles.
The penalty, announced by the Justice Department and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is the first under new rules aimed at limiting the amount of heat-trapping gases cars are allowed to emit.
Those regulations are a cornerstone of U.S. President Barack Obama’s plans to combat global warming and are achieved largely through improving vehicle fuel economy.
The payment could also serve as a precedent for other automakers who have overstated mileage in violation of the Clean Air Act.
Attorney General Eric Holder said the settlement underscores the need for car companies to be honest about their compliance with emissions standards.
Under the settlement, the Korean sister companies will forfeit greenhouse gas (GHG) credits worth more than US$200 million because the 1.2 million affected vehicles will emit about 4.75 million more tonnes of emissions than the automakers originally claimed.
The credits could have been sold to other automakers who aren’t meeting emissions standards.
Hyundai and Kia must also audit test results on current models, and set up an independent group to certify future test results, at a cost of around US$50 million.
Officials said the misrepresentations put other car companies at a competitive disadvantage, especially since fuel economy is seen as a critical factor that “consumers think about when they’re going to buy a car,” said EPA administrator Gina McCarthy.
“That tilts the market in favour of those who don’t play by the rules and it disadvantages those that actually do play by the rules,” McCarthy told a news conference. “That’s simply not fair, and it’s also not legal.”
The companies, which are both owned by the Hyundai Group and generally sell different versions of the same models, denied allegations that they violated the law.
Hyundai blamed the overstated mileage on honest misinterpretation of the EPA’s complex rules governing testing.
Both companies said they are paying the penalties—US$56.8 million for Hyundai and US$43.2 million for Kia—to end the probe and potential litigation.
All automakers conduct their own mileage testing based on EPA guidelines, and the agency does audits to make sure they are accurate.
In the past two years, the EPA has stepped up audits of automaker tests.
Just two weeks ago, the agency told BMW AG to cut mileage estimates on four of its Mini models.
Ford Motor Co. and Daimler AG unit Mercedes-Benz also had to cut numbers on their respective window stickers.
EPA officials wouldn’t comment on whether the agency is investigating other automakers.
In November 2012, the EPA ordered Hyundai and Kia to redo the window stickers on cars that made up about one-third of their model lineup.
Generally, gas mileage was overstated by one or two miles per gallon (mpg).
But the EPA’s tests found the highway mileage of one vehicle, the boxy Kia Soul, was six mpg too high.
Both automakers started a program to reimburse customers for the difference between their mileage tests and the EPA’s lower numbers.
The EPA and Justice Department, in an agreement filed in federal court, clearly said the automakers violated the law.
But the agencies said they reached the agreement because it was fair and in the public interest.
The government alleged Hyundai and Kia “chose favourable results rather than average results from a large number of tests.”
In a statement, Hyundai blamed the problem on EPA regulations.
The company said that some EPA mileage tests are done on a dynamometer, which is a treadmill for cars.
To calculate wind drag, friction in the engine and transmission, and tire rolling resistance, automakers do tests on a track, measuring how long it takes for cars to “coast down” to a stop.
That test yields a number that is programmed into the dyno.
Hyundai said automaker interpretations of the tests vary because regulations don’t specify exactly how to do the tests.
Tire rolling resistance, engine warm-up, winds and other factors can vary between EPA tests and those done by automakers, the company said.
“It was our regulatory interpretation within this broad latitude that was responsible for the ratings restatement,” spokesperson Jim Trainor said.
McCarthy, however, said that the car makers’ protocol was “systemically flawed” and “inconsistent with normal engineering practices and inconsistent with how any other company has been doing this.”
In a conference call, EPA officials said Hyundai also had to change its organizational structure to separate product and engine development from the people who do the mileage tests.
The old structure had the same people doing both, an anomaly in the industry, the officials said.