Canadian Manufacturing

Report reveals B.C. lagging behind on mine waste safety

by CM Staff   

Environment Manufacturing Regulation Sustainability Cleantech Mining & Resources cleantech environment Manufacturing mining natural resources regulation Sustainability

Key recommendations from the report include incorporating regulatory standards that will clearly prioritize safety over cost considerations.

VANCOUVER — New analysis reveals that British Columbia is lagging behind other jurisdictions in Canada and globally when it comes to mine waste safety. The report looks at the B.C. government’s first ever Audit of Code Requirements for Tailings Storage Facilities, released last year, and makes recommendations on how to improve existing laws and regulations on mine waste safety to protect communities and the environment.

“We make recommendations in eight key areas to update and strengthen B.C.’s regulations on mine waste safety to meet best practices and international standards,” said Dr. Steven Emerman, lead author of “Bridging the Gap”, retired geophysicist and former associate professor at Utah Valley University, and owner of Malach Consulting.

The report, produced by the BC Mining Law Reform network and MiningWatch Canada, is being released on the first day of the annual AME Roundup mining conference. It is intended to inform the B.C. government and the ministerial Code Review Committee currently revising the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia.

“B.C. touts itself as a responsible mining jurisdiction, implementing best practices and the highest international standards,” said Ugo Lapointe, BC Mining Law Reform network co-chair and National Program Co-Lead with MiningWatch Canada. “But the reality is that we still have out-of-date laws that will not adequately protect communities or the environment from mine waste disasters like we saw with the Mount Polley mine’s dam breach in 2014.”


Key recommendations from the report include incorporating regulatory standards that will clearly prioritize safety over cost considerations; planning for extreme weather and earthquakes; utilizing best available technologies and practices, including filtered tailings and no wastewater covers at closure; and requiring mine operators to cover all costs, including in the event of disasters, not just for planned closure. There are also recommendations to ensure transparency and accountability and to require Indigenous consent, in line with the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA), passed by B.C. two years ago, but not yet incorporated into mining regulations (see last week’s groundbreaking report by the B.C. First Nations Energy and Mining Council on this issue).


Stories continue below