Control your destiny by keeping work in-house
Quality and reliable delivery times are key factors prompting manufacturers to invest in technology to minimize subcontracting
Sponsored article by Blue Chip Leasing
A trend I’ve seen from my manufacturing client base this year is their choice to bring work back in-house as opposed to subcontracting it to another company.
I have a number of clients who looked at the amount of work they were sending out on a monthly basis and realized financing a new piece of equipment and keeping the work in-house would have a number of benefits.
One such company manufactures accessories for heavy-duty construction equipment. It has a well-laid-out shop with lots of space for growth, but had been subcontracting out its large parts because it lacked the proper equipment to handle them internally.
Unfortunately, the shop ran into difficulty getting parts machined locally within tolerances. Managers realized if they put two new pieces of equipment on the floor and did the work themselves—even with the additional costs of tooling and material—out-of-tolerance parts would no longer be a problem and the monthly cost would still be below what they had been paying to subcontract the work.
Another company in the same situation was manufacturing its own product, specialized packing equipment, but for the most part was doing just design and assembly while subcontracting all the machining.
In addition to spending hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, the company had two additional issues: it wasn’t able to control its deliveries and its margins were small.
Fortunately, the unit next door became available and the company set up its own small machine shop with a vertical machining centre and a CNC lathe.
The costs associated with bringing the work in-house, which included hiring some new people since they had very little experience with machining, were still far less than the costs of sending the work elsewhere. Most important, however, the shop now had much more control over its production, and therefore deliveries, and it now had a new income stream, which ultimately showed up on the bottom line because its profit margin increased significantly.
There’s no doubt keeping or bringing work in-house is the best and most profitable course of action for many shops.
Granted, putting a new piece of equipment on the floor comes at a significant cost, whether a manufacturer chooses to use its own working capital or money from its chosen financial institution. Having done equipment financing for about six years, I’ve been fortunate enough to get a unique perspective on many of these actual investments and transactions.
Most manufacturers invest in new equipment for one of the following reasons:
1. They’ve landed a new contract from an existing customer and need the additional capacity to manufacture more product. In many cases they’re under pressure to get equipment on the floor and running because they need to get more parts out the door. Since it’s an existing customer they’ve spent time developing, they don’t want to do anything that will negatively affect that relationship.
Even if manufacturers have landed business from a new customer, they’re still under the same pressure to deliver product on time, all while making a good first impression.
2. They’ve decided to put some new technology on the floor with the intent of making the same parts more efficiently.
Companies have to operate in an industry that’s unregulated and fiercely competitive, where even a few cents per part could mean the difference between winning or losing hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars’ worth of business.
At some point, it’s necessary to invest in new technology, because finding quicker and more efficient methods to make the same parts is the only way to remain truly competitive.
This could mean acquiring a new multiaxis CNC lathe capable of both turning and milling the part in one setup, as opposed to moving it between two separate machines.
Successful manufacturers that are financing equipment are looking at the transaction and making the business decision to analyze monthly cost and not just overall equipment cost. Once the thinking moves into this type of evaluation, the sticker shock of buying a new machine is either entirely disarmed or at least minimized significantly—and critical work can be kept in-house, and under control.
Ken Hurwitz is senior account manager with Blue Chip Leasing Corporation, an equipment finance company in Toronto. Ken has years of experience in the machine tool industry and now works to help all types of manufacturers either source or tap into their own capital to optimize their operations. Contact Ken at (416) 614-5878 or at via email. Learn more at www.bluechipleasing.com
This column originally appeared in the September 2016 edition of Canadian Metalworking.
The article is part of the Financial Management Success Centre, showcasing strategies to access working capital, reduce costs, and leverage the value of shop floor equipment.