Canadian Manufacturing

Ontario energy regulator orders OPG to cut $500M from nuclear budget

by The Canadian Press   

Canadian Manufacturing
Financing Human Resources Energy Infrastructure Public Sector

The cuts will need to come from the nuclear operator's compensation budget, which the OEB described as "clearly excessive"

Aerial view of the Darlington Nuclear generation station, where major refurbishment work is underway. PHOTO: Ontario Power Generation

TORONTO—Ontario Power Generation must cut $500 million over the next five years from its nuclear operations budget after the province’s energy regulator took issue with compensation, corporate and administrative costs, including “excessive” pension and benefit levels at the province’s largest electricity producer.

The Ontario Energy Board ordered the cuts in a decision released Friday.

OPG must cut $150 million in pensions and benefits costs by 2021. It will make the other $350 million in cuts over that period from proposed corporate costs and its administration, operations and maintenance budget.

The energy board’s decision comes after OPG, in May 2016, asked for $16.8 billion from the board for a period between 2017 and 2021—a request that would ultimately lead to an increase in rates.


“The OEB finds that OPG’s overall pension and benefits costs are clearly excessive… there is voluminous evidence demonstrating that the costs of these programs are well above market,” the OEB report said. “It would not be reasonable, in the OEB’s view, to require ratepayers to pay these excessive costs.”

According to the decision, OPG offers both current and retired employees a “comprehensive” benefits package including a “generous” registered pension plan and supplemental pension plan and they cost the company “hundreds of millions of dollars per year.”

The report also notes that Ontario’s Auditor General has previously highlighted the OPG’s pension plans and the company’s contribution ratios. In 2013, the auditor said OPG contributions are between four to one or five to one ratios when compared to employee contributions. In Ontario’s public service, the standard is generally a one to one contribution ratio, the OEB report said.

The report notes that while those ratios have come down, they remain at least a two to one ratio.

OPG said its request is intended to, in part, help offset the cost of a major nuclear refurbishment project at the Darlington Nuclear Station and the continued operation of the Pickering Nuclear Station past 2020.

The OEB’s decision approves a request for $4.8 billion in costs related to the Darlington refurbishments and $292 million in fees associated with Pickering and says a rate increase associated with the request will be retroactively effective from June 1, 2017.

“OPG is reviewing the decision in detail,” the company said in a statement, adding that it will submit a draft rate order to implement the OEB’s decision by Jan. 17.

While the final impact will be determined in early 2018, OPG estimated that its application would cost the average ratepayer an additional 65 cents a month over the five-year-period.

The OEB also notes that the impact of the rate increase would not immediately be felt by consumers because of the Liberal government’s 25 per cent cut to hydro bills.

The government plan is largely achieved by lowering time-of-use rates. That is done by removing from bills a portion of the global adjustment—a charge consumers pay for above-market rates to power producers—for the next 10 years.

In the meantime, producers will continue being paid the same, so Ontario Power Generation has been tapped to oversee the debt used to pay that difference through a new entity called OPG Trust. The cost of paying back the debt with interest will then go back onto ratepayers’ bills for the following 20 years.


Stories continue below