Canadian Manufacturing

3 mistakes to avoid when leasing equipment

by Ken Hurwitz   

Canadian Manufacturing
Financing Manufacturing Aerospace Automotive Cleantech Electronics Energy Food & Beverage Infrastructure Mining & Resources Oil & Gas Public Sector Transportation

Generally speaking, borrowers make three mistakes when they look into securing a lease

—Sponsored article by Blue Chip Leasing

All lending in Canada is based on the prime rate, which is the annual interest rate that major banks and financial institutions use to set interest rates for variable loans and lines of credit.

Any business that borrows money from the bank, regardless of whether it is a term loan, operating line, or line of credit, will have its borrowing rate based on the prime rate, which currently sits at approximately 4%.

Depending on the amount borrowed and the financial strength of the borrower, the actual cost will be anywhere between 0.5 and 3% above the prime rate. If an alternative lender is arranging financing for equipment and has only the equipment itself as collateral for the transaction, the lender will charge something slightly higher. With that being said, when the borrower’s credit is strong, the actual cost could be a matter of only a single percentage point above prime.


Understanding this background makes it less likely that mistakes are made during financing.

Limit leasing mistakes

Generally speaking, borrowers make three mistakes when they look into securing a lease. They are:

1. Comparing equipment leases with car leases.

A typical person’s experience with leasing usually comes in the form of arranging financing for their car. What happens next is that they look at how that transaction was handled and the rate charged, and try to compare it to arranging a lease for machinery to be used on their shop floor. These, however, are two totally different types of transactions.

First, when a customer leases a car, the lease structure is much different because the lender normally will have large residual at the end of the transaction, in many cases up to 50 per cent, which is guaranteed by the dealer. This means that the customer literally has the option to either purchase the car or toss the keys back.

The dealer is more than happy to take the car back and then resell it because it makes a better profit from the sale of the used car than if it were new.

The structure of a typical equipment lease is either 10% at the end of the term or a very nominal amount (even $1), and the borrower automatically takes ownership.

Second, the car lender has the ability to offer very cheap lease rates, usually between 0 and 2%, because the rate is subsidized by the manufacturer.

This can be a common strategy for equipment leases as well; some OEMs offer very cheap rates by using the same method.

I always tell my customers that they are much better off negotiating the best price for the equipment and keeping the financing as a separate entity. When we do the math, we find that they save more money in the long run by taking a substantial upfront discount (all equipment funders pay the seller in full upon delivery) and arrange the lease at true market rates.

2. Selecting low-cost equipment because of a weak credit profile.

When evaluating the application for an equipment lease, the first thing lenders look at is the asset being financed. When it comes to machine tools, anyone with industry knowledge knows a good, brand-name machine tool has excellent resale value.

Because a lender’s first concern is exit strategy in the event a deal goes bad, it wants to know that the asset can be resold with relative ease and recover a significant portion of the outstanding balance.

Next is the size of the transaction and whether it fits the equity box of the applicant. Specifically, lenders look at a borrower’s total net worth.

It is important to keep in mind that a new piece of machinery will start depreciating the moment it is installed in a manufacturing facility. If the buyer’s credit isn’t strong, the deal comes back to the asset that is being financed, because it’s the collateral for the lease.

When a buyer’s credit is less than stellar, it often tries to find an inexpensive machine, figuring this is the path of least resistance to getting a lender’s approval. However, the reality is that lenders prefer to finance a better asset, because it holds a higher resale value and can be resold easily if the deal goes bad and the machine is repossessed.

So how can you finance a quality machine when your credit isn’t good? The answer is simple: Provide a good deposit.

The rest of this column can be found on Canadian Metalworking, a market news site for the metal fabrication industry.

Ken Hurwitz bioKen Hurwitz is senior account manager with Blue Chip Leasing Corporation, an equipment finance company in Toronto. Ken has years of experience in the machine tool industry and now works to help all types of manufacturers either source or tap into their own capital to optimize their operations. Contact Ken at (416) 614-5878 or via email. Learn more at


Stories continue below

Print this page

Related Stories