Senator said he hoped review of proposed pipeline would be done by end of March, made no promises
WASHINGTON—John Kerry offered scant indication about his position on TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline, saying simply that he hopes to make “appropriate judgments” about the fate of the project should he officially become secretary of state.
The Massachusetts senator, appearing at his confirmation hearings, faced few questions on either climate change or the Keystone pipeline during almost four hours before the Senate foreign relations committee, of which he’s currently the chairman.
“There is a statutory process with regards to the review and that is currently ongoing,” Kerry said. “It will not be long before that comes across my desk, and I will make the appropriate judgments about it.”
The State Department is ultimately deciding Keystone’s fate because it crosses an international border.
Kerry, meantime, is widely expected to win swift confirmation as secretary of state, replacing Hillary Clinton.
State is “responsible for the environmental review, and there are specific standards that have to be met with respect to that review,” Kerry told the hearing.
“I am going to review those standards and make sure they are complete.”
He added he hoped the Keystone XL review would be done by the end of March, but made no promises.
A State Department spokesman previously suggested there would be no decision until after March 31.
“It is happening in the appropriate due course of business. We will try and get it done as soon as we can,” the senator said.
Kerry’s longtime devotion to climate issues—he unsuccessfully tried to push greenhouse gas legislation through Congress three years ago—has American environmentalists hopeful that he might nix the controversial $7-billion project.
Keystone XL would transport bitumen extracted from Alberta’s carbon-intensive oilsands to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast.
The project has become a flashpoint for U.S. environmentalists who view the oilsands as “dirty oil” and a symbol of climate change at large.
Keystone proponents, meantime, argue that the pipeline will create jobs and help provide the U.S. with energy independence from often hostile OPEC regimes.
During his hearing, Kerry said that American foreign policy is “defined by leadership on life-threatening issues like climate change.”
He added he will be a “passionate advocate” at the State Department on environmental issues.
The U.S. is currently taking part in a United Nations-led effort to come up with a new, worldwide emissions agreement.
At least one congressional climate hawk seems to be preparing for the possibility that Keystone XL is a done deal.
Henry Waxman, the Democratic head of the House of Representatives’ energy and commerce committee, said the Obama administration’s decision on Keystone would represent merely a “small” piece of the pie in efforts to combat climate change.
“This is only a small issue compared to the overall objective that the president and we want to achieve,” Waxman told a news conference.
Obama and the White House will have to weigh issues other than just climate change as it makes a decision on Keystone, he added.
“I know there are a lot of different factors, including our relationship with Canada, that (are) on his mind.”
Keystone is back on the hot seat in the U.S. capitol this week, in part because Obama spoke out during his second inaugural address about the need to confront climate change.
The president’s forceful repudiation of climate-change skeptics has prompted the U.S. environmental movement to urge Obama to back up his rhetoric by putting the brakes to Keystone XL.
Fifty-three senators, however—more than half in the upper chamber—sent the president a letter beseeching him to approve the project.