Experts suggest only a few issues remain to be solved before a deal is made.
OTTAWA—Officials on both sides of the Atlantic have insisted that the Canada-European trade negotiations remain on track and are close to resolution despite concerns the entry of the United States could put the four-year-old talks on the backburner.
Trade analysts said the announcement introduces a wildcard in the Canadian-EU talks that have already missed several deadlines, the latest for the end of 2012.
The precedent that comes to mind is Canada’s protracted and ultimately unsuccessful negotiations with South Korea, which were hung up by stern and unyielding opposition from Ontario and the auto industry, analysts say. While Canada started the process, the US was able to mop up the agreement, including on trade in autos.
Veteran trade negotiator and consultant Peter Clark says the Europeans will be trying to use the announcement as leverage to get Canada to offer greater concessions.
He added the Europeans are also pleading a lack of staff, which could be stretched once the US enters the picture, likely in June.
But a Canadian government official insists the announcement changes little, saying negotiations are at too advanced a stage.
“We’re down to a basket full of issues being addressed politically, so this doesn’t change anything,” the official. “There’s no worries here the EU is going to focus on the bigger fish down south because the bigger fish down south is waiting to see what the northern pike gets.”
In a news conference from Brussels, EU Trade commissioner Karel De Gucht said reaching a good deal was better than a quick one.
“I’m confident we can reach an agreement in the coming weeks but there are a number of issues that are not ready,” he said.
Although the negotiations have been carried on behind closes doors, trade experts monitoring the talks say there are only a few key issues remaining to be resolved. But they are the most politically difficult.
The concern among trade analysts is that given the volumes involved, Europe will lose interest in Canada once the US negotiations start in earnest.
The Canadian market represents about 2% of European exports, whereas the EU-US trade relationship is already the world’s biggest at about $1 trillion annually in goods and services trade.
Matthew Kronby of Bennett Jones, who was the federal government’s chief trade lawyer until last July, said the entry of the US into the dynamic does pose a risk for Canada, but also some advantages.
There is plenty of skepticism in the US about whether Europe is up to making the compromises that will be necessary for a modern trade deal, he said, so concluding one with Canada will be advantageous for Brussels.
“I think this could be helpful for Canada because the EU is facing pressure to conclude before beginning negotiations in earnest with the US,” he said.
On one specific issue—”geographical indications” whereby products from certain regions can claim exclusive naming rights, such as champagne—it would be useful for Europe to show Washington it can be practical, he said.
As well, rules of origin may not be as much of a sticking point for Europe if it can conclude a deal with both Canada and the US, given the production integration between the two countries.